|
Headline | Informative article on little domestic fight |
|
Page:
[1] |
Author | Comment |
Michiel
May-04-2014, 22:08 GMT Netherlands
 | I found this article very informative..
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2617484/Ed ie-Brickell-slapped-Paul-Simon-did-broke-heart.htm l
Suprising for me is the remark that Simon is believed to be worth $ 45 M. I can´t believe that, since I heard Art is owning a painting which alone is already worth over $ 30..... :-)
|
| |
Brenda
May-05-2014, 05:15 GMT Australia
  | Too sensational for me and some inaccuracies. As for printing photos of their kids and printing excerpts from their daughter's twitter and Grandma's photo I find very offensive. Also referring to Edie's childhood has got nothing to do with the incident which has been blown out of all proportion.
|
| 1 Scaaty |
Richard USVI
May-05-2014, 13:45 GMT USA - United Staates America
 | Did anyone comment on this article, which was related in the Guardian?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2620266/50 -years-British-girl-inspired-Paul-Simon-Woman-immo rtalised-Kathys-Song-lives-quiet-Welsh-village.htm l |
| |
Richard USVI
May-05-2014, 13:50 GMT USA - United Staates America
 | Sorry, I thought I saw this in the Guardian -- actually the Daily Mail. Not quite the same publication! |
| |
Brenda
May-05-2014, 15:39 GMT Australia
  | Yes I saw it today Richard. They say Kathy is a very private person and then print a photo of her and go on to talk about the Paul and Edie incident. She has never talked about her relationship with Paul and I doubt she ever will. Glad they still keep in contact though . Paul also did say that last year. They cannot even get the name of Paul's son correct. Unreal! |
| |
Scaaty
May-05-2014, 16:42 GMT Ireland
 | Her husband/partner seems willing enough to talk? Wasn't Ben the name of Jonah's son in one trick pony? |
| |
lincoln duncan
May-05-2014, 17:41 GMT United Kingdom
 | No. He was called Matty :) |
| |
Michiel
May-05-2014, 22:56 GMT Netherlands
 | Hi Brenda, indeed it's sensational. But also informative, IMHO :-) |
| |
Brenda
May-06-2014, 12:57 GMT Australia
  | Sorry Michiel but I still think they had no right to photograph Kathy and give her married name when they said she was a very shy and private person. Most of the information they gave was already known. Paul has previously said she lived in North Wales, was a very shy person and probably still was. That they still kept in touch and she was now a grandmother. Why on earth would they reference the Paul/Edie story in an article about Kathy. It has absolutely nothing to do with her . Her husband may have talked to the press but whether he was willing or did so hoping they would leave her alone is another matter.
|
| |
Michiel
May-06-2014, 15:18 GMT Netherlands
 | O I fully agree on that Brenda. But that does not mean the article was not informative. |
| |
Bodo
May-06-2014, 21:06 GMT USA - United Staates America
  | The picture should be deleted there. This person is private and there should be more respect - you either have to ask for permission and make a nice picture, or you stay away.
Is this a picture you want to have about yourself on the internet - definately not. I am sure she could sue the paper because she is a private person and of no interest to the public.
Some journalists have absolutely no sense for that. That was 50 years ago, let her alone. Yes her husband talked to them, but I wonder: was it a interview, or did the journalist act like a private person/fan to get some info. I would bet it is the 2nd.
|
| 2 Michiel, Brenda |
|
Page:
[1]
|